The Administratrix is currently planning what to do with the RESOURCES page/section next. Herewith follows the current state of the thinking taxonomical at present. The basic categorization settled on: ARTES LIBERALES – ARTES MECHANICAE – RERUM ANTIQUARUM – MODERNITAS. The current plan is to attach a collection of free-standing posts to the page; which posts will also be categorised as “resources” and thus lookable-upable via that drop-down menu (like CFP, Employment, and so on). This will unclutter the RESOURCES page, and provide a less cumbersome and more specifically useful webography, to some extent replicating, and to some extent complementary and supplementary to the Blogroll down the right-hand side of the Forum.
So the end result will be a shorter RESOURCES page, to serve – via linked headings – as a gateway to a group of free-standing posts. I’ll also be playing around with head-words of various sorts, and many items will be cross-listed or cross-referenced on two or more posts. No categorization as to “Medieval” or “Renaissance” – only by topic.
This is all very much work in progress, and will be for some time (not least as I have a day-job too, and a book to finish, and suchlike). Although it is of course always fun to have an excuse to reread the Categories and associated commentary. In the meantime, I would be very grateful indeed for all comments and suggestions: most importantly, to check that I have covered and properly represented (one way or another) all members’ interests.
PLANNED RESOURCES POSTS AND THEIR ATTACHMENT TO THE RESOURCES PAGE
ARTES LIBERALES
1. PHILOLOGIA
TEXTS
texts/trivium: language & literature; grammatica; figurae; auctores; literary life – the reading/writing/commentating/rereading/rewriting cycle – dictionaries and other reference online
(in) ENGLISH (↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ OTHER EUROPEAN – ex. for Anglo-Norman French written in England)
IRISH (↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ LATIN)
LATIN (↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ ENGLISH, IRISH)
OTHER EUROPEAN (↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ ENGLISH ex. Anglo-Norman French written outside “France”)
OTHER (no insult intended – simply those languages and their literatures that are less well covered by scholars based in Ireland)
GENERAL ↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ : TEXTUALITY – REPOSITORIES
POETICS & literary criticism (contemporary) ↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ COMMENTARY & CONTINUATION – MUSIC – PHILOSOPHIA
Rereading, rewriting, and textual continuations:
↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ COMMENTARY & CONTINUATION – MODERNITAS
TEXTUALITY
palaeography
codicology
history of the book
↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ TEXTS – HISTORIES – ARCHAEOLOGY – REPOSITORIES
COMMENTARY & CONTINUATION
rereading, rewriting, and textual continuations:
poetics, literary criticism, and literary theory
literary history
Medievalism etc: scholarship, refashionings, collection, edition: back to the starting point of philology
↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ POETICS – MODERNITAS
2. MERCURIUS
Actio; rhetorica applied / in practice: discourse, law, polemics, propaganda, public life; materia artis & ars dictaminis
HISTORIAE
histories, human sciences, historiography:
histories cultural, intellectual, political, social, gender, religious
learning & teaching; education and scholarship
geographies, cartography, travel
other specific and/or localised subject-matter and topics not covered by the above
↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ MATERIAL HISTORY: TEXTUALITY – ARCHAEOLOGY
anthropology, sociology, ethnography
popular culture, folklore, daily life, non-written cultures
the practice of everyday life, including religious practice and spirituality (↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ PHILOSOPHIA)
historiography and meta-history, history of the field(s), histories of scholarship (↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔MODERNITAS – TEXTUALITY)
GENERAL ↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ ARCHAEOLOGY
3. QUADRIVIUM
MUSIC AND MUSICOLOGY
mathematics
natural sciences, physical sciences, astronomy and cosmology
history and philosophy of science
↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ POETICS – PHILOSOPHIA – ARTES MECHANICAE – ARCHAEOLOGY
4. PHILOSOPHIA
Dialectica, intelligentia, ingenium, cogitatio. Abstract thought, reason, reinen Vernunft, logica
philosophy
theology (↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ RELIGIOUS PRACTICE)
things theoretical, abstracted, comparative, and meta; aesthetics: ↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ POETICS – MUSIC – ARTES MECHANICAE (ex. in Renaissance for the latter).
ARTES MECHANICAE
TÉΧΝΗ: Technology, practical arts, crafts
painting, sculpture
architecture
medicine, inc. midwifery, “folk / popular medicine”
history and philosophy of science
↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ QUADRIVIUM – RERUM ANTIQUARUM – TEXTUALITY
RERUM ANTIQUARUM
Archaeology, antiquities, preservation, collection.
↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ MATERIAL HISTORY: HISTORIES – TEXTUALITY – HISTORY OF SCIENCE – REPOSITORIES
MODERNITAS
THE MODERN MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE WORLD
REPOSITORIES: museums and libraries ↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ ARCHAEOLOGY – TEXTUALITY – HISTORY OF SCIENCE
Universities, centres, M&R studies
The Profession
↔CROSS-REFERENCES↔ COMMENTARY & CONTINUATION – HISTORIAE (ESP. META-) – QUADRIVIUM (SCIENCES) – ART. MECH. – RERUM ANTIQUARUM
—————————————-
SEE ALSO: The RESOURCES page – some webography in VILLAGE GREEN posts – the BLOGROLL to your right.
—————————————-
CHECK…
to have covered:
- Categories
- grammar – dialectic – rhetoric
music – arithmetic – geometry – astronomy - artes liberales
artes mechanicae - theory/practice – reason/expression – ars rhetorica vs. materia artis vs. ars dictandi
1 Comment
3 February, 2009 at 10:29 am
Well now. I’m mainly using the above as a guide for Things To Have Covered; but have set the new Links up according to these main parameters:
(1) the kind of material (ex. primary sources vs. secondary resources)
(2) what people might be looking for: hence the complete alphabetical list of links (which will, over the course of time, also be maximally cross-referenced, with repeated entries for the same item, and key terms grouping entries together – ex. IRISH)
(3) maintaining the distinction between local and global resources, for pragmatic reasons. Ex. Irish and British research funding bodies, unions, and scholarly societies.
While the criteria in the main post above are useful for producing a beauteous narratively coherent system of knowledge, they may have more to do with Admin’s current work on late-13th-c. “encyclopaedism” (ex. Breviari d’amors) than with practical considerations. That is, the other way around: taking users’ potential questions as a starting-point (Admin now recalling wise words by Molly Robinson-Kelly and Sarah-Jane Murray on this very subject, when working together way back when, re. the Charrette Project’s database approach… d’oh …)
(On which: continuing amusement – re. databases – at the difference between “interrogatable” and “questionable”.)